Transformation / Operations

    Transformation in the manufacturing industry

    As at August 2026 Reading time 12 minDonato BlandolinoDonato Blandolino

    Transformation in manufacturing companies rarely fails because of the concept. It fails because change has to be implemented alongside series production that must keep running every day. Anyone who underestimates this plans an initiative that adds up on paper but does not work on the shop floor.

    This page provides an overview of the five situations that trigger operational transformation, the typical causes of failure, the stages of an assignment and the question of when interim management is a better approach than consultancy.

    What does transformation in manufacturing mean?

    Not a programme, but a trigger. In practice, it is almost always driven by one of five situations.

    A site is losing money. Restructuring and turnaround. There is rarely a single cause; capacity utilisation, scrap, set-up losses and a product mix whose profitability no one has ever calculated usually overlap.

    Production is being relocated or established from scratch. Plant relocation, plant set-up, a second site. Two plants have to operate simultaneously for months while one is being dismantled and the other is not yet capable of producing anything.

    A product enters series production. Industrialisation and ramp-up. The transition from development to manufacturing is the most expensive phase in the product life cycle if it goes wrong.

    Processes can no longer support growth. Material flow, production planning, supply chain. Processes that worked at half the volume break down at full volume.

    A leadership position is vacant. Interim management to bridge the gap, often at precisely the moments when a plant can least afford to be without that leadership.

    These situations differ in their technical details. They barely differ in the reasons why they fail.

    The five situations at a glance

    SituationTypical triggersCritical factorApproximate duration
    Restructuring and turnaroundSite operating at a loss, margins collapsing, customer threatening to leaveTransparency about which part actually makes money12 to 24 months
    Plant relocationCost structure, site consolidation, proximity to the customerTime required for requalification and customer approvals12 to 24 months
    Plant set-up and industrialisationNew product, new region, capacity expansionWhether the supply chain and qualification can support the ramp-up curve9 to 18 months
    Process optimisationGrowth overwhelms existing processes, inventories riseSet-up times, material flow, planning quality3 to 9 months
    Interim cover for a leadership roleUnexpected absence, vacancy during a critical phaseSpeed of taking over, acceptance within the team6 to 12 months

    These timeframes are based on experience from our assignments and vary according to the degree of vertical integration, regulatory requirements and the number of sites affected.

    Why transformation projects fail

    Because day-to-day operations always win. Three patterns emerge regardless of industry or size.

    Change is handled on the side. The same people expected to drive the project are keeping series production running. Whenever there is a conflict, the customer call-off takes priority, not the project plan. This is the right commercial decision, yet it still brings one in two initiatives to a standstill.

    Assumptions are treated as facts. Almost every failed project contains two or three assumptions that were never identified as such. Can the supply chain support the ramp-up curve, or is there merely a commitment? Is the team qualified, or is that only in the plan?

    Responsibility is divided. If no named individual is accountable for the overall result, each department optimises its own part. Friction moves up the hierarchy and remains unresolved there.

    There is also a fourth point that is mentioned less often: hardly anyone has learnt anything from the last failed attempt. Companies document results but do not analyse decisions. That is why every new project begins with the same questions and the same mistakes.

    What an honest project review looks like in practice:

    Recognising early warning signs

    Three signs indicate trouble long before it appears in the report.

    SignalWhat lies behind itWhat to do
    Status jumps from green to red without amberAmber is seen as a weakness, problems are only reported once they have escalatedActively encourage amber reporting and do not penalise it, with senior leaders setting the example
    Meetings revolve around escalations rather than progressThe project is no longer being managed, only its consequencesAddress the causes of recurring escalations rather than resolving them individually
    The question of who decides is answered with a department rather than a nameDivided responsibility, friction moves up the hierarchy and remains unresolvedAssign a named person responsible for each work package

    Stages of an assignment

    In four steps, with the first being the most important.

    1. Understand what is actually happening

    We start on the shop floor, not in the meeting room. Follow a part on foot, count handling steps and metres travelled, speak to shift supervisors and machine setters. This regularly uncovers the unofficial version of the last attempt, which is more valuable than any final documentation.

    2. Test assumptions, not deadlines

    Before planning begins, facts are separated from hopes. This distinction determines the course of the project more than any management tool.

    3. Implement with operational responsibility

    We take on leadership for a defined period, make decisions in day-to-day operations and are accountable for them. We do not produce concepts for someone else to implement.

    4. Embed

    An assignment is complete when the organisation continues to operate without us. Not when the action list has been ticked off.

    Results from practice

    Indicative figures from our assignments in recent years, anonymised by industry and region.

    Industry and regionSituationOutcome
    Defence technology, Germany and the NetherlandsTurnaround and ramp-up across multiple sitesScaling vehicle production from a few units per month to up to 1,500 per year, during ongoing operations without any production interruption
    Rail technology, SwitzerlandIndustrialisation and restructuringTransition from make-to-stock to make-to-order production, establishment of capacity planning, introduction of quality inspection in production
    Watchmaking industry, Switzerland and MauritiusOperational leadership and cross-plant coordinationDeputy manufacturing leadership with around 130 employees, introduction of paperless manufacturing and a visual planning board
    Electronics manufacturing, Europe and AsiaMulti-year programmes on order throughput and planningRedesign of the order management process from order receipt to delivery, reorganisation of production planning across six countries
    Automotive supplier, GermanyProduction planning and material flowOptimisation of physical material flow and planning logic, embedding the changes through team training

    Systems play a role in this, but a supporting one. If a process does not work on the shop floor, it will not work in the system either. Conversely, even the best shop floor is of no use if the planning behind it is configured incorrectly. The point is to master both together, not to be particularly good at just one.

    Interim management or consultancy?

    Manufacturing companies rarely lack expertise. They lack capacity. The people who could drive a transformation initiative are simultaneously keeping series production running, preparing for the next audit and resolving this morning’s disruption. An additional concept does not help them. Additional leadership capacity does.

    Traditional consultancyInterim Management
    OutcomeAnalysis, concept, recommendationChange implemented in operations
    ResponsibilityFor the recommendationFor the operational result
    Role in the companyExternal advisory roleTemporary leadership role within line management
    PresenceWorkshops, steering committeeShop floor, shift, day-to-day operations
    End of the assignmentHandover of the conceptWhen the organisation operates reliably without us

    In critical programmes, we have regularly taken over from leading consultancies, not out of arrogance, but because operational integration and consistency from top to bottom were missing.

    We ourselves started at the operational level. Goods receipt, logistics, production planning, plant management. This path still shapes where we look first today.

    Competence is the prerequisite, not the differentiator. Whether a team follows depends on the personalities of those leading it. Personality First.

    Industries and functions

    Functions we fill: plant and production management, supply chain and logistics, production planning and work preparation, programme and project management, operations at executive management level.

    Frequently asked questions

    When is an interim manager worthwhile in manufacturing?

    When an initiative needs additional leadership capacity that is not available internally, and when someone needs to take responsibility for implementation rather than just a recommendation. Typical situations include setting up a plant, relocation, the start of series production, restructuring or the loss of someone in a key role.

    How long does a transformation assignment last?

    That depends on the situation. Focused process optimisation often delivers results within three to nine months, while a turnaround or relocation generally takes one to two years. What matters is not the duration, but whether the organisation continues to operate reliably afterwards without external support.

    What distinguishes interim management from management consultancy?

    Responsibility. Consultants analyse and recommend; implementation remains with the client. Interim management takes on a temporary leadership role and implements changes directly, including day-to-day operational decisions and team leadership.

    How quickly can an assignment start?

    Usually within a few weeks. In urgent situations, such as the loss of someone in a key role or escalating production ramp-up problems, it can start sooner.

    Which countries do we work in?

    Our focus is on the DACH region, with project experience in other European countries, the Middle East and Asia. Our headquarters are in Switzerland, with an additional office in Dubai.

    Do we also work with medium-sized companies?

    Yes. The operational patterns are the same as in large corporations, and the impact is often visible sooner because decision-making processes are shorter.

    How much does an interim assignment cost?

    The daily rate depends on the role, duration and scope of responsibility. More important than the rate is the question of what a delayed production ramp-up or another year of losses costs. We clarify the parameters in an initial discussion before preparing a proposal.

    About the author

    Donato Blandolino is the founder and managing director of SMART iNTERIM Management GmbH. His background is in hands-on operations, from goods receiving and logistics through production planning to plant management, and he has been responsible for transformation and turnaround programmes at manufacturing companies in Europe, the Middle East and Asia for over a decade.

    View expert profile

    About SMART iNTERIM

    SMART iNTERIM Management supports manufacturing companies through operational transformation: restructuring, turnaround, plant set-up, plant relocation, industrialisation and process optimisation. We come from hands-on practice, not from a distance, and take operational responsibility rather than simply making recommendations. Headquartered in Switzerland, with a branch in Dubai.

    Further reading